Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 05:23

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Animi velit error sapiente nihil.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
End of an Era: Landsat 7 Decommissioned After 25 Years of Earth Observation - USGS (.gov)
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What is the best sunscreen lotion for oily skin for men?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
This STD is nearly 30 times worse in Onondaga County than it was 20 years ago - Syracuse.com
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Kate Middleton and Princess Charlotte Opt for Aquamarine for Trooping the Colour 2025 - Vogue
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.